

|
 |
 |
 |
|
Novell Will Continue To Hold GPL
By
Pearl Mistry
Mumbai, Feb 23, 2007
Open source vendor Novell has asserted that there is no truth in speculations of it losing out on the General Public License (GPL) to sell Linux operating system software.
Following Novell's collaboration with software giant Microsoft to provide customers choice and flexibility through improved interoperability and manageability between Linux and Windows, rumors were ripe in the industry about the Free Software Foundation (FSF) reviewing Novell's right to sell new versions of Linux software.
"Novell will not lose its license to sell Linux. We are a founding member of the Open Invention Network and also a founding member of the new Linux Foundation," claimed Sandeep Menon, director-Linux business, Novell West Asia.
"Linux is core to Novell's business strategy, and we recognize that working with the community to ship these core components is essential to our business. Therefore, ensuring that we can ship the core free software components that make up Linux is a top priority for Novell," Menon added.
Commenting on efforts being taken by Novell, Menon said, "The GPL version 3 (GPLv3) is still a work in progress. Novell has supported the Free Software Foundation's pursuit of transparent discussions that surface and address the needs of all relevant constituencies, viz., customers, developers, and vendors."
Menon stated that the FSF and Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) have publicly promised to ensure that the drafting of the new license will take place in an open, transparent way, and that they will work with all constituencies to ensure that the new license has broad buy-in.
The open source community heavily criticized Novell for the partnership. "Passion typically runs high when we approach an Open Source versus Proprietary Software conversation, and the initial reactions were understandable," said Menon. He added that the initial pushback came from the developer community that was not clear as to the full intentions of the relationship.
Keen to explain the need for the tie-up with Microsoft, Menon added, "The tie-up was for the sake of customers. The world has come to realize that we live in a mixed IT environment world there are applications that run better on Linux, and others that better run on Windows. We are ensuring that SUSE Linux and Windows work with each other seamlessly, taking this burden away from the customer. Secondly, it protects the customers against any liability for IP infringements."
Adhering to his company's stand, Menon said that there was no reason to view the step taken by it as anti Linux. "This is good for customer confidence in Linux, the open source community and the broader IT ecosystem," he said.
|
 |
What IP infringements? Novell are giving that fud credibilty with this backstabbing deal. If M$ ever try to go down that path they would get hit with so many counter suits their head would spin. I don't beleive a word that comes out of the current Novell execs any more. |
|
|
- jesse,
FOSS, Melbourne
|
|
 |
 |
 |
No. They will not be able to distribute GPLv3 software, including new versions of GNU software, without ditching the patent cross-license. |
|
|
- Matthew Flasche,
Anonymous, Atlanta, GA
|
|
 |
 |
Disclaimer |
UNML and its sites:
www.channeltimes.com, www.techtree.com
and www.cxotoday.com provide
Comments and discussion boards as a professional medium
for the various businesses of the IT industry to discuss
business problems. Gossip, personal attacks and unsubstantiated
charges are prohibited. Messages posted on this Web site
as discussion threads or Comments (Content) are solely the
opinions of their creators and do not necessarily reflect
the opinions of UNML or its sites
www.channeltimes.com, www.techtree.com
and www.cxotoday.com.
All individuals who post material to this web site are solely
responsible for all Content that they upload, post or otherwise
transmit via the Web Site. |
| UNML
cannot vouch for the authenticity of the user or company
names or e-mail addresses associated with posted messages.
Under no circumstances will UNML
or ChannelTimes
be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not
limited to, for any errors or omissions in any Content,
or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result
of the use of any Content posted or otherwise transmitted
via the Bulletin Boards. |
| UNML
reserves the exclusive right to edit or remove messages
containing inappropriate language or other material that
could be construed as libelous, potentially libelous, or
otherwise offensive or inappropriate. Discussion forums,
bulletin boards and chat facilities are provided by UNML
solely for the convenience of those who make use of the
service. UNML does not endorse the products and services
or other offerings mentioned in messages. |
|
|
|
 |
|